First let me show you evince there is no such thg as a Gay gene. "There’s No Gay Gene, Says Scientists In The Quarterly Review of Blogy, rearchers at UC Santa Barbara and Uppsala Universy Swen have nclud through their rearch that sexual orientatn n be cid through epi-marks, which are temporary swch a…
Contents:
- THE "GAY BOMB" AND MEDIL APHRODISIACS
- MILARY WS IG NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR 'GAY BOMB'
- GAY BOMB: STORY BEHD THE STORY
- AIR FORCE LOOKED AT SPRAY TO TURN ENEMY GAY
- IN 1994, THE U.S. MILARY ACTUALLY CONSIRED BUILDG A “GAY BOMB”
- THE U.S. MILARY ONCE PROPOSED A “GAY” BOMB
THE "GAY BOMB" AND MEDIL APHRODISIACS
* estrogen gay bomb *
Former Nobel lreat and other rearchers at Harvard award the 2007 Ig Nobel Peace Prize to the creators of the "gay bomb" -- a non-lethal ary weapon unr velopment tend to duce moralizg homosexual behavr wh aphrodisiacs. First let me show you evince there is no such thg as a Gay gene.
“There’s No Gay Gene, Says Scientists. “As a prs release explas almost prehensible terms, the study fds “sex-specific epi-marks, which normally do not pass between generatns and are th ‘erased, ’ n lead to homosexualy when they pe erasure and are transmted om father to dghter or mother to son.
MILARY WS IG NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR 'GAY BOMB'
I remember the Gay Bomb story, havg vered New Scientist a uple of years ago — — right after Noah ma his ial report — and beg amed by the subsequent media tert. It’s wikipedia and even has s own web se ("Make Love Not War.") The media redisvered this week, […] * estrogen gay bomb *
Now let me show you evince of the NWO actively tryg to turn people gay.
Gay people didn’t need help to bee that way 2, 000 years ago and they sure don’t need to be forced to bee that way. So, what n turn people “gay”?
GAY BOMB: STORY BEHD THE STORY
Actually In my opn I don’t thk “Gay” or “homosexual” is the right term. Below is proof that Gay people are ed as a weapon by the ele.
“Air Force Consired Gay ‘Love Bomb’ Agast Enemi. Well for one the gay/straight bate ually ends up as a relig nversatn. The Ig Nobel peace prize went to the US Air Force’s Wright Laboratory Oh for s 1994 plan to velop a weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irristible to one another, an ia later dubbed the “gay bomb”.
AIR FORCE LOOKED AT SPRAY TO TURN ENEMY GAY
Details of the scheme were unvered a classified document (pdf) that suggts a strong aphrodisiac would be “pletely non-lethal” but uld be serly disptive “pecially if the chemil also ed homosexual behavur. I remember the Gay Bomb story, havg vered New Scientist a uple of years ago -- -- right after Noah ma his ial report -- and beg amed by the subsequent media tert. And granted, the "Gay Bomb" never received any feral fundg.
*We know about the "Gay Bomb" bee of the Sunshe Project's work – and bee was bizarre and tchy enough to get the media's attentn. Do gay uns really have bad disciple? And th the "gay bomb" was born.
"One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, pecially if the chemil also ed homosexual behavur, " says the proposal om the Air Force's Wright Laboratory Dayton, Pentagon did not ny that the proposal had been ma: "The partment of fence is mted to intifyg, rearchg and velopg non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women uniform.
IN 1994, THE U.S. MILARY ACTUALLY CONSIRED BUILDG A “GAY BOMB”
"Aaron Belk, director of the Universy of California's Michael Palm Centre, which studi the issue of gays the ary, said: "The ia that you uld subm someone to some aerosol spray and change their sexual behavur is ludicro. The ia of a gay bomb me om a sire to bilate and distract their opponents but not necsarily kill them.
THE U.S. MILARY ONCE PROPOSED A “GAY” BOMB
Wikimedia CommonsThe gay bomb was a theoretil cloud of gas that would turn enemy soldiers gay. The ncept of a “gay bomb” sounds like somethg out of a bad science fictn movie. 5 ln ventn: the gay bomb.