Abstract. Lbian and gay male upl formalize romantic partnerships at different rat. The rat differ differently pendg on natnal ntext, wh fe
Contents:
I DO, BUT I N’T: THE IMPACT OF MARRIAGE NIAL ON THE MENTAL HEALTH AND SEXUAL CIZENSHIP OF LBIANS AND GAY MEN THE UNED STAT
Two strikg featur characterize the state of public opn about gay rights general and gay marriage particular.1 The first is the creasg level of * google scholar gay marriage *
Put simply, a number of natns have wnsed “sea chang” public opn about gay other strikg feature is the wi variatn across natns public opn about gay rights and gay marriage, as well as related attus about gay men, lbians, and homosexualy (see Table 1). Lookg at the natnal level, a 2013 survey of 16 “veloped” natns found that support for full regnn of gay marriage was >75% Swen, Norway, and Spa but <30% South Korea, Japan, and Poland (Ipsos, 2013). A 2013 survey of 39 natns found “broad acceptance of homosexualy North Ameri, the European Unn, and much of Lat Ameri, but equally wispread rejectn predomantly Mlim natns and Ai, as well as parts of Asia and Rsia” (Pew Rearch Global Attus Project, 2013).