The middle fger is where you put a rg that you don't want to be affiliated wh anythg. People wear them to look fly while flippg people off. If 's black 's a symbol of asexualy. It has archaic symbolism wh Saturn. It has nothg to do wh homosexualy. Gays wear rgs on their thumbs for oil checks." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn
Contents:
GAY RG FGER
The gay rg fger is the middle fger on the right hand. It is symbolic for the right hand bee guys do have the right to enter to marriage or civil unn. The middle fger reprents a sentiment reflected to those that oppose . As opposed to the tradnal left hand/rg fger of heterosexual marriage, US uniquely for proud gay people." name="Dcriptn" property="og:scriptn * gay finger wear ring *
The gay rg fger is the middle fger on the right hand.
As opposed to the tradnal left hand/rg fger of heterosexual marriage, US uniquely for proud gay they gay, their weddg bands are on their middle fgers? Yeah, that’s the gay rg lambshund June 26, 2018Flag.
MEN WHO WEAR RGS ON THEIR MIDDLE FGER, ARE THEY GAY?
Oh, and you n't -gay him. So y gays, should e the middle fger for their weddg Anonymoreply 3Augt 5, 2021 6:05 AM. So y gays, should e the middle fger for their weddg thought of that way before.
It has nothg to do wh homosexualy. Gays wear rgs on their thumbs for oil the middle fger rg normally promisergs, or llegergs. If te, means there are more heterosexual swgers out there than there are gays and lbians (if you accept the lower timat of the size of the queer muny).
Relig nservativ are always harpg on the bad example that gay married male upl supposedly set for married straight upl—bee we married gays are ls likely to be monogamo (married lbians are more likely to be monogamo than gay or straight upl, so really, the monogamy issue should be a wash)—but they don't have much to say about married heterosexual swgers. Straight upl n do whatever they want: have children or not, get married church or married at Cy Hall, be monogamo or swg, all whout plat om the same people who sist that gays shouldn't be able to marry bee we're not good at monogamy (I like to thk we're better at non-monogamy, thank you), n't make babi (jt like fertile straight upl, elrly straight upl, and the two), and J will pe all over everythg. So if relig nservativ are jumpg up and down about nonmonogamo gay upl while ignorg more numero nonmonogamo straight upl—if we're subjected to hate mpaigns while swgers get a pass—then 's clear their issue isn't that gay people aren't good at monogamy.