Gay Marriage On The Ballot In 4 Stat (INTERACTIVE RESULTS) | HuffPost Latt News

Contents:

• BILL TO PROTECT GAY MARRIAGE RIGHTS GETS ENOUGH VOT TO PASS U.S. HOE
• CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT
• CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR
• GAY MARRIAGE
• WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE
• WILL ABORTN AFFECT THE MIDTERM VOTE FOR NDIDAT? LSONS OM THE BAN GAY MARRIAGE BALLOT IATIV
• GAY MARRIAGE ON THE BALLOT IN 4 STAT (INTERACTIVE RESULTS)
• VOTERS PASS ALL 11 BANS ON GAY MARRIAGE
• RSIAN NSTUTN CHANGE ENDS HOP FOR GAY MARRIAGE

BILL TO PROTECT GAY MARRIAGE RIGHTS GETS ENOUGH VOT TO PASS U.S. HOE

REUTERS/David Dee DelgadoWASHINGTON, July 19 (Rters) - A bill to protect gay marriage rights secured enough vot to pass the U. Californians will vote on a proposal to amend the state Constutn on the 2024 ballot to reaffirm gay marriage rights — a ut move that amid natnal anxiety after recent lgs by the nservative-leang U.

Although there is no current threat to the legaly of gay marriage, and Print Bin signed a bill safeguardg last year, the Democratic-domant state Legislature is seekg to remove language om California’s Constutn that still f marriage as between a man and outdated state fn has been emed unenforceable and unnstutnal thanks to feral law, but LGBTQ advocy groups are askg voters to repeal and amend the California Constutn to stead explicly state that marriage is “a fundamental right.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS WILL BE ASKED TO REAFFIRM GAY MARRIAGE PROTECTNS ON 2024 BALLOT

Gav Newsom was out of state, Senate lear Toni Atks (D-San Diego) signed bills to law on his behalf as the first out gay actg ernor. The measure put gay and lbian marriag on hold the state, but a feral appeals urt 2010 emed Proposn 8 unnstutnal.

The se ma s way to the US Supreme Court, which dismissed an appeal 2013 over same-sex marriage on jurisdictnal grounds, lg private parti did not have standg to fend California’s voter-approved ballot measure barrg gay and lbian upl om state-sanctned wedlock. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a subsequent legislative attempt to legalize gay marriage. Early Years: Same-Sex Marriage Bans In 1970, jt one year after the historic Stonewall Rts that galvanized the gay rights movement, law stunt Richard Baker and librarian Jam McConnell applied for a marriage license Gerald Nelson rejected their applitn bee they were a same-sex uple, and a trial urt upheld his cisn.

” This lg effectively blocked feral urts om lg on same-sex marriage for s, leavg the cisn solely the hands of stat, which alt blow after blow to those hopg to see gay marriage beg 1973, for stance, Maryland beme the first state to create a law that explicly f marriage as a unn between a man and woman, a belief held by many nservative relig groups. Though the gay rights movement saw some advancements the 1970s and 1980s—such as Harvey Milk beg the first openly gay man elected to public office the untry 1977—the fight for gay marriage ma ltle headway for many years. In 1989, the San Francis Board of Supervisors passed an ordance that allowed homosexual upl and unmarried heterosexual upl to register for domtic partnerships, which granted hospal visatn rights and other years later, the District of Columbia siarly passed a new law that allowed same-sex upl to register as domtic partners.

CALIFORNIA STILL HAS AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE LAW ON THE BOOKS. VOTERS ULD REMOVE NEXT YEAR

C., 1993, the hight urt Hawaii led that a ban on same-sex marriage may vlate that state nstutn’s Equal Protectn Clse—the first time a state urt has ever ched toward makg gay marriage Hawaii Supreme Court sent the se—brought by a gay male uple and two lbian upl who were nied marriage licens 1990—back for further review to the lower First Circu Court, which 1991 origally dismissed the the state tried to prove that there was “pellg state tert” jtifyg the ban, the se would be tied up ligatn for the next three Defense of Marriage Act Opponents of gay marriage, however, did not s on their hnch.

Congrs 1996 passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which Print Bill Clton signed to didn’t ban gay marriage outright but specified that only heterosexual upl uld be granted feral marriage benefs. That is, even if a state ma gay marriage legal, same-sex upl still wouldn’t be able to file e tax jotly, sponsor spo for immigratn benefs or receive spoal Social Secury payments, among many other act was a huge setback for the marriage equaly movement, but transient good news arose three months later: Hawaii Judge Kev S. Phg for Change: Civil Unns The next saw a whirlwd of activy on the gay marriage ont, begng wh the year 2000 when Vermont beme the first state to legalize civil unns, a legal stat that provis most of the state-level benefs of years later, Massachetts beme the first state to legalize gay marriage when the Massachetts Supreme Court led that same-sex upl had the right to marry Goodridge v.

The state fally troduced the untry to gay marriage (m the feral benefs) when began issug same-sex marriage licens on May 17, that year, the U. 2004 was notable for upl many other stat as well, though for the oppose reason: Ten typilly nservative stat, along wh Oregon, enacted state-level bans on gay marriage.

GAY MARRIAGE

Kansas and Texas were next 2005, and 2006 saw seven more stat passg Constutnal amendments agast gay towards the end of the , gay marriage beme legal var stat, cludg Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont (the first state to approve by legislative means) and New Hampshire. Domtic Partnerships Throughout the and the begng of the next, California equently ma headl for seawg on the gay marriage state was the first to pass a domtic partnership statute 1999, and legislators tried to pass a same-sex marriage bill 2005 and 2007. Perry legalized same-sex marriage early 2010s ntued the state-level battl over gay marriage that fed the precedg , wh at least one notable event.

For the first time the untry’s history, voters (rather than judg or legislators) Mae, Maryland, and Washgton approved Constutnal amendments permtg same-sex marriage marriage also beme a feral issue 2010, Massachetts, the first state to legalize gay marriage, found Sectn 3 of DOMA—the part of the 1996 law that fed marriage as a unn between one man and one woman—to be unnstutnal.

WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT A SEEMGLY FAKE DOCUMENT A GAY RIGHTS CASE

Wdsor, nservative Jtice Anthony Kennedy sid wh Jtic Ruth Bar Gsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan favor of same-sex marriage rights, ultimately makg gay marriage legal across the natn June this time, was still outlawed only 13 stat, and more than 20 other untri had already legalized gay marriage, startg wh the Netherlands December 2000. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage natnally two years 2020, Nevada beme the first state to ensure the right to same-sex marriage s state nstutn. AdvertisementSKIP ADVERTISEMENTA supposed requt for a webse for a same-sex weddg played a mor role a major clash between ee speech and gay rights at the Supreme Supreme Court led last week that a Colorado graphic signer has the right to refe to create webs for same-sex Jiang for The New York TimAfter the Supreme Court led last week that a Colorado graphic signer has the right to refe to create webs for same-sex marriag, crics of the cisn raised qutns about a form clud urt papers the se that appeared to show that a gay uple had sought the servic of the signer, Lorie man who supposedly submted the form said he was unaware of s existence until a reporter for The New Republic lled him.

More about Adam LiptakA versn of this article appears prt on, Sectn A, Page 12 of the New York edn wh the headle: Crics Are Qutng a Seemgly Fake Document a Recent Gay Rights Case.

There, a referendum banng gay marriage was placed on the ballot (as was several other stat) wh the exprs purpose of drivg Evangelil and other nservative voters to the polls.

WILL ABORTN AFFECT THE MIDTERM VOTE FOR NDIDAT? LSONS OM THE BAN GAY MARRIAGE BALLOT IATIV

Soon after, three polil scientists set out to terme how important the gay marriage ban was to Gee Bh’s vote.

“What is most strikg about the rults is that support for anti-gay marriage measur both stat affected the vote for Bh 2004, even when ntrollg for his level of support 2000…. Although the ban on gay marriage did not ph Bh over the top every state (Bh won Oh but Kerry won Michigan) s power affectg the vote for print was clear.

GAY MARRIAGE ON THE BALLOT IN 4 STAT (INTERACTIVE RESULTS)

If the ban on gay marriage worked to boost the Republin vote 2004, image how powerful a ban on abortn uld be for Democrats 2022. ↑ Huffgton Post, "Supreme Court Rul On Prop 8, Lets Gay Marriage Rume In California, " June 26, 2013. ↑ The Jewish Daily Forward, "Orthodox Jo Fight Agast Gay Nuptials, " Augt 28, 2008.

INTERACTIVE RESULTS: Gay Marriage On The Ballot In 4 StatVoters four stat st ballots on marriage equaly. For gay folks, then, is all the more stgg an irony that the one place where same-sex upl are visible is the advertisg war over Proposn 8. The need to walk that tightrope helps expla why the actual subjects of next month’s iative, gay upl, were “ned” by the “No on 8” mpaign’s ads.

VOTERS PASS ALL 11 BANS ON GAY MARRIAGE

“Our gay dghter and thoands of our fellow Californians will lose the right to marry, ” says mother Julia Thoron. A subsequent ad, all text wh voice-over narratn, mentns marriage only once (“Regardls of how you feel about marriage, ’s wrong to treat people differently unr the law”) and never the phrase “gay marriage” or even the word “gay.

RSIAN NSTUTN CHANGE ENDS HOP FOR GAY MARRIAGE

Asked about the absence of gay upl, a senr “No on 8” official told KPIX-TV San Francis that “om all the knowledge that we have and rearch that we have, [those] are not the bt imag to move people. ” Another ad attacks overweeng judg, mocks San Francis Mayor Gav Newsom for sayg, “It’s gog to happen whether you like or not, ” and go on to claim that gay marriage uld e people to be sued for their beliefs and church to lose their tax exemptn.

Whatever the tactil nsiratns, the absence of gay upl and gay marriag om California’s gay-marriage bate mak for an oddly hollow discsn. It leav voters of good nscience to njure their own mds the ads that are not beg aired: Ads that show how gay marriage directly affects the upl and muni that need most. Chief among those expectatns is that spo will do whatever is necsary to re for each other — which is valuable, bee cens data show that almost a third of California’s gay upl have only one wage-earner, and almost a fifth have at least one disabled partner (about the same, by the way, as for straight married upl).