Lookg for onle fn of gay the Medil Dictnary? gay explanatn ee. What is gay? Meang of gay medil term. What do gay mean?
Contents:
GAY
However, they are problematic bee they obscure social dimensns of sexualy; unrme the self-labelg of lbian, gay, and bisexual people; and do not sufficiently scribe variatns sexual and WSW often imply a lack of lbian or gay inty and an absence of muny, works, and relatnships which same-genr pairgs mean more than merely sexual behavr. In part bee the terms held the promise of rcg AIDS stigma, which has been irratnally attached to gay men and lbians, we, the thors, helped to promulgate the now-faiar acronyms. Acrdgly, MSM was troduced to reflect the ia that behavrs, not inti, place dividuals at risk for HIV fectn, a particularly important distctn given that scientific and medil experts had ially intified gay inty as a risk for HIV/AIDS, a characterizatn that stigmatized lbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populatns and nfound efforts to prevent HIV fectn.
While the epimlogil perspective aimed to rce gay and lbian to what is thought of as their necsary re—sexual behavrs that place dividuals at risk—the social nstctnist crique, wh s orig gay and lbian studi and femist and queer theory, seeks to do the oppose: seeks more textured unrstandgs of sexualy that do not assume alignments among inty, behavr, and sire. Richard von Krafft-Ebg’s Psychopathia Sexualis troduced the notn of “antipathic sexual stct, ” ed terchangeably wh “homo-sexual stct” and referred to as “anomaly, ” “abnormal, ” “tated, ” “nropathic, ” “generate, ” “verted, ” and “jur.
”7 Later terms, which siarly advanced a disease mol, clud “sexual psychopaths” and, ed, “homosexuals.
GAY
”8(p241) In the 20th century, many sexual-mory men and women fiercely rejected homosexual favor of self-chosen terms such as homophile, gay, lbian, and more recently DL (down low), two-spired, and transgenr, among others. The central tes of this approach are as follows: (1) no social group is homogeno, (2) people mt be loted terms of social stctur that pture the power relatns implied by those stctur, and (3) there are unique, nonaddive effects of intifyg wh more than one social group.
However, terms such as sexual mori and gay, lbian, and LGBT (lbian, gay, bisexual, transgenr) have acquired global ronance and polil and cultural meangs. The diffn of the terms has led not to homogenizatn but to a multiplitn of inti, as Wtern and non-Wtern tegori and practic mix and renfigure. 16–18 Dpe their limatns, there is ample evince that the terms gay, lbian, and LGBT are wily ed alongsi lol terms, signifyg liberatnist iologi for sexual-mory people many cultur.
9–11 The terms have been ed by such anizatns as Amnty Internatnal, Human Rights Watch, and the Internatnal Lbian and Gay Associatn. The latter is a feratn of natnal and lol muny-based groups wh reprentativ om 90 untri, “dited to achievg equal rights for lbian, gay, bisexual and transgenred (LGBT) people everywhere.